Global perspective Human stories

UN rights office welcomes new US Supreme Court death penalty ruling

Ravina Shamsadani, Spokesperson for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
UN Photo
Ravina Shamsadani, Spokesperson for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

UN rights office welcomes new US Supreme Court death penalty ruling

Citing a new ruling issued by the United States Supreme Court, the United Nations human rights office today touted this latest development as a watershed moment in the country’s rulings regarding the use of the death penalty against people with mental and intellectual disabilities.

OHCHR (The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights) welcomes the Supreme Court’s ruling as a significant step towards limiting the scope of the death penalty in the United States,” spokesperson Ravina Shamdasani told the reporters in Geneva.

According to OHCHR, the particular case involved a death row prisoner in Florida. To date, the state of Florida has refused to evaluate any evidence about a defendant’s alleged intellectual disability unless the person scored 70 or below on an IQ test. The defendant in this case had scored 71 on one IQ test.

However, stating that “intellectual disability is a condition, not a number,” the Supreme Court ruled in this case that it was unconstitutional to refuse to consider mental factors other than an IQ test.

The current ruling will affect not only Florida, the state which has the second-largest number of death penalty cases after California, but also other states that have people on death row in the US. Moreover, judges will now be required to take a less mechanical approach to mental disability in capital cases, according to OHCHR.

In 2002, the Supreme Court clarified in the Atkins vs. Virginia case that no state may execute people with mental disabilities. Further, Tuesday’s decision regarding the Florida case builds on Atkins, making it clearer now who counts as an individual with intellectual disabilities.

“The death penalty is the gravest sentence our society may impose. Persons facing that most severe sanction must have a fair opportunity to show that the Constitution prohibits their execution,” the Court states in its judgment, adding that “Florida’s law contravenes our Nation’s commitment to dignity and its duty to teach human decency as the mark of a civilized world.”

“We urge United States’ authorities to go further and to establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty,” added Ms. Shamdasani.